|
Overview Less is more. Or at least, so we are told when it come to audio signal processing: the more parts, the worse the sound. In general this is true. This argument has often been voiced in favor of tube circuitry because a tube circuit usually requires many fewer components than a comparable solid-state device. In fact, it is amazing just how few elements are needed to make a good sounding tube phono or line stage. But if this logic holds, then even the tube circuit must yield before the passive circuit, for example a passive switch box with attenuator. What could sound better than just wire and resistors?
Yet when the shoot out between passive and active commences, this logic does not always predict the victor. Yes, the passive is almost always cleaner and more detailed; but it is also often strangely eviscerated, thin sounding, seemingly bass shy as well. Well, the answer is obvious: the active tube circuit is adding euphonic distortions to the mix. Maybe. Or maybe something else altogether. Whatever the reason, the tube circuit is often preferred. And only a masochist or someone so gripped by the logic or theory of "less must be more" would forego the preferable sound of the active.
Design Goals
|
|